| ||
April 28, 2004 (link) 11:32 PM Since mentioning it in a chat with S., I've been trying to analyze this chord sequence from Pink Floyd's "Great Gig in the Sky": Gm7/D | Bbm/Db | F#7 | Bm This sequence comes at the end of the "loud part", and takes us out of the jam section in G minor, back to the B minor tonality that starts the song (though both here, and at the beginning of the song, we only get a single B minor chord before immediately heading for G minor / B-flat major). It's a pretty unusual set of chords, and I remember feeling pretty proud of myself when I first parsed it out, back in 1991 or so, listening on headphones to Morgan's CD of Dark Side of the Moon. So the question is, why does this set of chords work? I already alluded to the fact that, in terms of key structure, "Great Gig" is a weird song from the get-go -- it starts out in B minor, but doesn't do anything to affirm that key, and uses a tritone jump that ought to be jarring, but somehow isn't: Bm | F (lydian) | Bb | F/A | Gm | C7 (etc.) I still haven't figured out why that works; Rick Wright's use of a Lydian chord there seems counterintuitive, yet I suspect that may play a big part in why it works. But anyway, getting back to the first example, I think part of what's going on there is that the F#7 chord is both the V of i in B minor, and also a "German" augmented sixth chord in the key of Bb minor (enharmonically spelled as Gb-Bb-Db-E, where the E is an alteration of Eb). In other words, the progression could have headed for Bb minor instead, like so: Gm7/D | Bbm/Db | "F#7" (= Gb7) | F7 | Bbm But by going for B minor, the "F#7" chord functions as an augmented sixth chord -- or, if you prefer, an Eb minor seventh chord (iv in Bb minor) in first inversion, with the tonic raised 1/2 step. (Figuring out how to describe augmented sixth chords can be a tricky business; the Piston harmony book, which is the one I studied in college, changed its mind between editions and now calls them V of V, which makes some sense.) Also, you could argue that putting the Bb minor chord in first inversion hints at a dominant relationship to the F#7 chord -- in other words, that Bbm/Db is "almost" a C#7 chord, or V of V in B minor. All that makes sense, and using an augmented sixth chord to modulate up a half-step (here, Bb minor to B minor) is a very common progression. But what about the first two chords, going from G minor to Bb minor -- how does that work, and in particular, why is Bb minor an effective passing chord? It's not that the key relationship is that remote; particularly if you replace the Bb minor chord with a Db major chord, you've got a progression (Gm | Db) that's found in lots of places (especially film scores). And yet I don't think that kind of Debussy-like thing is going on here -- I actually think the relationship is more functional than that, but I can't quite pinpoint what it is. I guess you could call it a I-III progression using modal mixture -- i.e. instead of B-flat major, you switch to B-flat minor -- but that doesn't feel like a completely satisfying explanation, though it may be the right one. Current music: Nucleus - Snakehips Etcetera April 24, 2004 (link) 1:11 PM By the way, searching for "OOPS" + "out of phase", I found this link, which is kind of a neat idea: I wonder if it works? 1:03 PM I've talked before about the "karaoke" feature in Panic Software's excellent MP3 player, Audion. To recap, it takes a stereo recording, inverts the phase of one channel, and mixes them both down to mono; the result is that anything in the center of the mix (i.e. whatever the two channels have in common) is cancelled out, and since the stuff that's in the middle is often vocals, a lot of the time you end up with a sort of "karaoke mix" of the song in question. (I've talked about the physics of that before.) Hardcore fans of a particular band will often make and distribute out-of-phase stereo mixes (or OOPS) of the band's albums; it seems like Beatles fans are particularly fond of this. If the effect were always just karaoke, it wouldn't be that exciting, but sometimes you wind up removing other sounds or instruments, or otherwise shifting the soundstage/balance around radically -- both of which can be an interesting way of hearing parts that normally would get buried in the mix. As you can see from the Beatles links above, lots of famous bands/albums have been mined for the OOPS effect -- I've seen OOPS lists for the Beach Boys, Abba, Pink Floyd, and so on -- so for most of those, if there's anything really cool that happens, someone probably already knows about it. (Certainly the bootleg makers do: dishonest ones will often put these OOPS mixes out on CD, claiming that they're rare outtakes, when in reality anyone can create these mixes from scratch at home.) But for those of us who count some not-very-famous bands/albums among the music we love, odds are that we stand a good chance of finding something new (i.e. undocumented) by trying these techniques out -- which, if you're into treasure hunts, makes it more fun. Of course, a lot of the time you won't come up with much except a thin, crummy-sounding mono mix that sounds like it's been put through the World's Cheapest Flanger. ("Thin" because, since bass is usually panned to the center, it's typically the first thing to go.) Once in a while, though, you discover something pretty cool. So last night, I sat down with a few CDs I know pretty well, put them through "Audion karaoke", and had some interesting results. Since I'd just seen Amanset and Pinback in concert, I started out with them:
It can be a wild feeling to hear things in a song that you've never heard before -- all the more so when it's a song you've listened to dozens of times, and feel like you know it backwards and forwards! Another one I did a while ago was Bonobo's "The Shark", a track from the Hi Fidelity Lounge Vol. 4 compilation; the beats on the original are too loud (especially the hi-hat), but they disappear completely on the out-of-phase version -- would that there were a way to average the two. By the way, the Amanset/Pinback show was very good (together with El Guapo, whom I also enjoyed). I was particularly impressed with Zach's bass playing: I didn't realize that he was playing so many of the polyphonic lines on songs like "Tripoli" on his instrument in real time! On "Crutch" he pulls out a cool technique where he frets the high notes with the index finger of his right hand while using his other three fingers to strum: pretty slick. Plus it's really tough to have an original bass sound in this day and age, and the fact that he's got such an instantly recognizable style is very impressive. 11:00 AM If you know who wrote the song that gave this site its name, and you know what one of my favorite books is, then you'll know why I enjoyed discovering this connection, taken from p. 465 of the paperback edition of Watership Down: As the wind freshened from the south, the red and yellow beech leaves rasped together with a brittle sound, harsher than the fluid rustle of earlier days. It was a time of quiet departures, of the sifting away of all that was not staunch against winter. Unfortunately, the album in question isn't one of my favorites by him, but it's still pretty cool to know where those titles came from. (I wonder if he actually read the book and meant it as an homage, or if he just grabbed a copy that happened to be handy when he needed to think of song titles?) So far, I haven't found "A Pale Smile" or "Visible Thoughts" in there, though, and they may well come from elsewhere; alas, Amazon doesn't offer a searchable text. Current music: Charalambides - Hand Held Live CDR (Comments for April 24, 2004) (4 comments so far) April 21, 2004 (link) 9:25 PM Here's some of the cool stuff in question. Those of you who remember my "Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Potassium" write-up (I'm looking at you, JDB) might appreciate this email I got recently: Surfing around for weird music and song poems, I came across the name Lolla Mont Gue, author of a song ("Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Potassium") you wrote about some time ago (Dec. 2002). As it so happens, I met Ms. Mont Gue a few times and I can give you a little background info (if you want). Essentially she was a housewife (when I met her she lived in Crawford, Nebraska, the absolute ass end of nowhere) who wrote and self-published songs as a hobby. And a later postscript: If my memory is accurate, Ms. Mont Gue died in the late seventies, but I'm really at a loss for the exact year (and it might have been into the 80's). I really have no idea how seriously she took her song writing or how clearly she understood the song poem business or her place in it (i.e.: cash cow). I prefer to think she had no (or only small) illusions and just liked having the physical versions of her songs, an indulgence she could apparently afford. It's a pretty cool feeling to learn something about the person behind the song -- before this email, Lolla Mont Gue was just a name (albeit an intriguing name) to me, whereas now, I feel like I have some sense of who she was, and what her song may have meant to her. Big thanks to Michael for sharing this story! 9:50 AM Some cool stuff to report, but I can't post it right this second. I did think of one more visual image, though:
(You want me to explain it? I can't, really, except that the song always sounded somehow "Viking" to me.) Current music: (none) (Comments for April 21, 2004) (2 comments so far) April 3, 2004 (link) 3:28 PM Listening (yet again) to Abbey Road the other day, I was struck by how the "Love you, love you" vocals on "The End" conjured up a very specific image for me: a small, homely, mixed-gender choir, made up of people whose dress suggests pre-modern poverty (i.e. peasants, early pioneers), and who somehow seem out of place in a way that almost, but not quite, makes me wince. (Compare the first song in Disney's Beauty and the Beast.) I feel like there's another Beatles song that makes me imagine much the same thing, but I can only think of "The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill" and I don't think that's it. (I don't think it's "Wild Honey Pie" either, though it might be; "Gimme Some Lovin'" by the Spencer Davis Group also comes to mind.) That got me thinking about all the visual images I used to get as a kid when listening to certain songs. Some of the images made no particular sense, or didn't really seem all that connected to the song. A few of the ones I can remember:
(I've also talked here about a few PBS bits that I found creepy as a child -- the dripping-flower-with-Vivaldi on Sesame Street, the Dr. Who title theme, and so forth -- though that's not really the same thing.) Current music: Jess Roden - "Trouble in the Mind" |
|
Current reading: Euripides II, ed. Richmond Lattimore and David Grene -----
archives:
March 2010 -----
primary links: Josh blog -----
-----
-----
|